TY - JOUR AU - Woodward Mark AU - McMurray J. AU - Dargie H. AU - Emdin C. AU - Anderson S. AU - Conrad Nathalie AU - Kiran A. AU - Salimi-Khorshidi G. AU - Mohseni H. AU - Hardman S. AU - McDonagh T. AU - Cleland J. AU - Rahimi K AB -

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of variations in provider performance and its determinants may help inform strategies for improving patient outcomes. METHODS: We used the National Heart Failure Audit comprising 68 772 patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF), admitted to 185 hospitals in England and Wales (2007-2013). We investigated hospital adherence to three recommended key performance measures (KPMs) for inhospital care (ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on discharge, beta-blockers on discharge and referral to specialist follow-up) individually and as a composite performance score. Hierarchical regression models were used to investigate hospital-level variation. RESULTS: Hospital-level variation in adherence to composite KPM ranged from 50% to 97% (median 79%), but after adjustments for patient characteristics and year of admission, only 8% (95% CI 7% to 10%) of this variation was attributable to variations in hospital features. Similarly, hospital prescription rates for ACE-I/ARB and beta-blocker showed low adjusted hospital-attributable variations (7% CI 6% to 9% and 6% CI 5% to 8%, for ACE-I/ARB and beta-blocker, respectively). Referral to specialist follow-up, however, showed larger variations (median 81%; range; 20%, 100%) with 26% of this being attributable to hospital-level differences (CI 22% to 31%). CONCLUSION: Only a small proportion of hospital variation in medication prescription after discharge was attributable to hospital-level features. This suggests that differences in hospital practices are not a major determinant of observed variations in prescription of investigated medications and outcomes. Future healthcare delivery efforts should consider evaluation and improvement of more ambitious KPMs.

AD - Nuffield Department of Population Health, The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Department of Population Health, The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Clinical & Academic Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Whittington Health, London, UK.
Cardiology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Nuffield Department of Population Health, The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. AN - 27530132 BT - Heart CN - [IF]: 5.595 DP - NLM ET - 2016/08/18 J2 - Heart (British Cardiac Society) LA - Eng LB - UK
FY17 N1 - Emdin, Connor A
Conrad, Nathalie
Kiran, Amit
Salimi-Khorshidi, Gholamreza
Woodward, Mark
Anderson, Simon G
Mohseni, Hamid
Dargie, Henry J
Hardman, Suzanna M C
McDonagh, Theresa
McMurray, John J V
Cleland, John G F
Rahimi, Kazem
Heart. 2016 Aug 16. pii: heartjnl-2016-309706. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309706. N2 -

OBJECTIVE: Investigation of variations in provider performance and its determinants may help inform strategies for improving patient outcomes. METHODS: We used the National Heart Failure Audit comprising 68 772 patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF), admitted to 185 hospitals in England and Wales (2007-2013). We investigated hospital adherence to three recommended key performance measures (KPMs) for inhospital care (ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on discharge, beta-blockers on discharge and referral to specialist follow-up) individually and as a composite performance score. Hierarchical regression models were used to investigate hospital-level variation. RESULTS: Hospital-level variation in adherence to composite KPM ranged from 50% to 97% (median 79%), but after adjustments for patient characteristics and year of admission, only 8% (95% CI 7% to 10%) of this variation was attributable to variations in hospital features. Similarly, hospital prescription rates for ACE-I/ARB and beta-blocker showed low adjusted hospital-attributable variations (7% CI 6% to 9% and 6% CI 5% to 8%, for ACE-I/ARB and beta-blocker, respectively). Referral to specialist follow-up, however, showed larger variations (median 81%; range; 20%, 100%) with 26% of this being attributable to hospital-level differences (CI 22% to 31%). CONCLUSION: Only a small proportion of hospital variation in medication prescription after discharge was attributable to hospital-level features. This suggests that differences in hospital practices are not a major determinant of observed variations in prescription of investigated medications and outcomes. Future healthcare delivery efforts should consider evaluation and improvement of more ambitious KPMs.

PY - 2016 SN - 1468-201X (Electronic)
1355-6037 (Linking) ST - Heart T2 - Heart TI - Variation in hospital performance for heart failure management in the National Heart Failure Audit for England and Wales Y2 - FY17 ER -